Legal Opinion

United States v. Farwell

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided February 28, 1948No. Cr. 2096PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIMOND, District Judge.

The defendant was held to answer to the grand jury for violation of Chapter 70 of the Session Laws of Alaska 1947, “an act to forbid persons convicted of a felony from carrying concealed weapons and providing for penalties .therefor.” The relevant provisions of the Act are as follows: “No person who has been convicted of a felony involving assault, and battery, assault with a dangerous weapon, burglary, robbery ,and like crimes, under the laws of the United States, of the Territory of Alaska, or any State of the United States, or any other government or country shall…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Ex Parte LangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Kepner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  3. United States v. LanzaSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. Downes v. BidwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  5. Grafton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1907

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Waller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Baker v. City of FairbanksAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Knudsen v. City of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Sally Christy, Also Known as Marion Robertson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
  5. Application of Robert L. Bell v. State of KansasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API