Legal Opinion
Murray v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided January 18, 2001No. 97-AA-1720PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WAGNER, Chief Judge:
Petitioner, Joseph Murray, seeks review of a decision of the Director of the Department of Employment Services (DOES) denying his claim for compensation under the District of Columbia Workers’ Compensa tion Act, D.C.Code §§ 36-301 to 345. DOES determined that Murray failed to establish by credible evidence that he sustained an injury arising out of his employment with his employer, intervenor Paul Brothers Oldsmobile. Murray argues for reversal and remand of the case to the agency on the grounds that: (1) the hearing examiner failed to accord him the benefit of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Dell v. Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Ferreira v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Swinton v. J. Frank Kelly, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- Matter of DwyerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- McNeal v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Ligon v. StilleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2010
- Smith v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Rachael B. Storey v. DOES & The Catholic Univ. & Liberty Mutual Ins. Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.