Lerwill v. Inflight Motion Pictures, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
WOLLENBERG, District Judge.
Plaintiff has brought this action based on the contract of employment be tween his collective bargaining representative and the defendant on behalf of himself and all other employees or former employees of defendant similarly situated. In sum, the complaint charges that overtime was not paid to the plaintiffs as required by the contract. It appears that the defendant followed' a practice of allowing employees to work one or more shifts in excess of five per week and paid for such additional…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- J. I. Case Co. v. BorakSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Wood v. LovettSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Culver v. Bell & Loffland, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944
- Rigopoulos v. KervanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- Caldwell v. Alabama Dry Dock & Shipbuilding Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1947
3Cited by31 opinions
- Anderson v. Sara Lee Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007
- Philip Williamson Itzik Riefronda Kirlin Thomas Painter,plaintiffs-Appellants v. General Dynamics Corporation,opinionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- James E. Zombro v. Baltimore City Police Department Bishop L. Robinson, Commissioner, Baltimore City Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
- Knepper v. Rite Aid Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- Bouaphakeo v. Tyson Foods, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2008
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.