Legal Opinion
James E. Zombro v. Baltimore City Police Department Bishop L. Robinson, Commissioner, Baltimore City Police Department
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided April 20, 1989No. 86-2659PublishedCited by 125 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHAPMAN, Circuit Judge:
This is an age discrimination action brought under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985 and the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Plaintiff James Zombro, a member of the Baltimore City Police Department, contends that he was unlawfully transferred from one department to another because of his age. He seeks compensatory damages and reassignment to his former post with the Inner Harbor Tactical Division. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of defendants Police Commissioner and Police Department. We affirm, but for reasons different from those…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Arnett v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. MurgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Sampson v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Brown v. General Services AdministrationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by125 opinions
- Hughes v. BedsoleCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
- Elizabeth SHERLOCK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Kimberly Mattoon v. City of PittsfieldCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Richard D. LAFLEUR, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, Et Al., Defendants, and Susan Steeg, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- Anthony Hildebrand v. Allegheny CountyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
120 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.