Legal Opinion
Kelly v. Lodwick
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 25, 2011No. 4D09-4501PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON APPELLEES’ MOTION FOR REHEARING OR CLARIFICATION
GERBER, J.
We deny appellees’ motion for rehearing, but grant appellees’ motion for clarification. We have revised the last two paragraphs of our April 6, 2011 opinion accordingly. For ease of reference, we replace our April 6, 2011 opinion with the following.
The plaintiffs, as assignees, sued the defendant insurance agents for negligence and breach of fiduciary duty for failing to obtain coverage for their assignor. The circuit court dismissed the action on the ground that the statute of limitations period expired before the plaintiffs sued…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Clay Elec. Co-Op., Inc. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
- Gracey v. EakerSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
- City of Miami v. BrooksSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
- Blumberg v. USAA Cas. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2001
- Edwards v. LandsmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Anderson v. Branch Banking & Trust Co. ex rel. BankAtlantic, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2015
- Donald Kipnis v. Bayerische Hypo-UND Vereinsbank, AGCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
- Anderson v. Branch Banking & Trust Co.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2014
- Medical Data Systems, Inc. v. Coastal Insurance Group, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- Amato and Bouchard v. City of Miami BeachDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.