Legal Opinion

Condra v. Anderson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 21, 1953No. 12458PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPE, Justice.

Appellants have appealed from a judgment sustaining appellees’ special exceptions and motion for summary judgment. Thelma Condra, Frances Condra and Rosie Hay, appellants, filed suit against the Bexar County District Attorney, two of his investigators, and two detectives from the City of San Antonio, for the purpose of recovering damages arising out of a claimed illegal entry and search of their premises. Their petition alleged that the search was illegal because the warrant contained an inadequate description of the premises to be searched, and also because the search was…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Comeaux v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
  2. Elms v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1930
  3. Justice v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929
  4. Rhodes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1938
  5. Welch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1941

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pizzalato v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
  2. McCown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1960
  3. State v. MartelleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1969
  4. Martinez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API