Legal Opinion

Marc Anthony Bell v. Larry Mizell and Roland W. Burris

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided May 3, 1991No. 90-3098PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

The notice of appeal was filed 43 days after judgment had been entered, the appellant’s court-appointed counsel having erroneously believed that the 30-day period for appealing the denial of a petition for habeas corpus ran from the issuance of the certificate of probable cause for appeal, which the district judge issued to permit the petitioner to appeal. 28 U.S.C. § 2253; Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(1). The 30-day period having run, it was too late for the district judge to extend the time for appealing. Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(5).

Nevertheless, the appeal is timely. The reason is that the application for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Torres v. Oakland Scavenger Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Clark Jerome McMillan v. Eugene BarksdaleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Domingo Marmolejo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  2. United States v. Levon Mason Dumont, Kareem A. Nagib, and Walter Premchand AtriCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  3. Rodgers v. Wyoming Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  4. Wells v. RykerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  5. Bivens v. RednourCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API