Legal Opinion
Tinoco v. Belshe
District Court, N.D. California
Decided October 30, 1995No. C-94-0947 WHOPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
ORRICK, District Judge.
In this case, California recipients of State Disability Insurance (“SDI”) 1 who receive Medi-Cal benefits under the Aid to Families With Dependent Children Act (“AFDC”) complain that they presently pay $90 per month more than they should, because the State of California (“California”) requires them, in violation of the law, in computing the “share of cost” 2 to treat SDI income as earned, income rather than unearned income.
To correct this alleged inequity plaintiff brings this class action against California’s health and financial officers, the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- New Jersey Primary Care Ass'n v. New Jersey Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- McBride v. Department of Public WelfareCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008