Horton v. Prague Nat. Bank
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from County Court, Lincoln county; H. M. Jarrett, Judge. Action by the Prague National Bank, a corporation, against Sam Horton. There was judgment for defendant, and from an order granting a new trial, the defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
BURPORD, C.
This was an action originally instituted in a justice court of Lincoln county by the Prague National Bank, a corporation, against Sam Horton. A trial was had to a justice of the peace, and judgment rendered for defendant. Prom such judgment the plaintiff appealed to the county court of Lincoln county, where a trial was had to a jury and a verdict found for the defendant, upon which verdict on the same day it was returned, a judgment for defendant was entered. Within three days thereafter, and at the same term at which the trial was had, a motion for new trial was filed;…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Capital Traction Co. v. HofSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- American Publishing Co. v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Hogan v. BaileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Brenner v. BigelowSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
- Yarnell v. KilgoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- White v. DougalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. WainscottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. WarrenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- De Meglio v. Studebaker Corporation of AmericaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Adams v. WallaceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.