Legal Opinion
Eckhardt v. Morley
California Supreme Court
Decided February 28, 1934No. Docket No. Sac. 4798PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This is an áction to enjoin an execution sale. H. M. Kurtz made a promissory note to plaintiffs and appellants for $1700, and to secure payment executed on May 18, 1932, a chattel mortgage on certain automobiles, among them the Buick sedan involved in this action. The mortgage was recorded in Yolo County, where the property was situated, on May 27, 1932. On May 28, 1932, a certified copy of the mortgage and certificates of ownership of the ears were deposited with the Division of Motor Vehicles, with a request for registration. The registrar refused to file them for the reasons…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Dougery v. BettencourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
3Cited by8 opinions
- T & O Mobile Homes, Inc. v. United California BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Chelhar v. Acme GarageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- In Re KesslerDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1950
- Sadberry v. GriffithsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Coca Cola Bottling Co. v. FelicianoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.