Legal Opinion

Chelhar v. Acme Garage

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 18, 1936No. Civ. A. 839PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, P. J.

This is an appeal by an execution creditor of the defendant J. W. Eder from an order determining title to a motor tow-car to be in Harry Beyer, who interposed a third-party claim.

It appears that Eder and Beyer had been partners in a garage business conducted under the name of Acme Garage. The partners having decided to dissolve their partnership, it was agreed between them that the interest of Beyer should be purchased by Eder, who should execute to Beyer a promissory note in the principal sum of $1500 secured by a chattel mortgage of all the garage equipment, including the otowear. Notice of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Stephens v. . PerrineNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  2. Ruggles v. CannedyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Wolpert v. GriptonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Old Settlers Investment Co. v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Ransom & Randolph Co. v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1935

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In Re WiegandDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1939
  2. Barber v. Reina Nash Motor CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 1953
  3. England v. Moore Equipment Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1950
  4. Bank of America Nat. Trust & Savings Ass'n v. SampsellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
  5. Teater v. Good Hope Development Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1942

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API