Legal Opinion
Flaherty v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 24, 1958No. 37,284, 37,285PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Matson, Justice.
Appeal, in each of two separate actions consolidated for trial, from an order granting plaintiffs a new trial exclusively upon the ground of errors of law occurring at the trial and upon no other ground.
These two actions, one by plaintiff Bridget T. Flaherty for damages for personal injury, the other by plaintiff Martin P. Flaherty, her husband, for special damages and for damages for loss of services, are based upon the alleged negligence of the defendant in operating its railroad train on which plaintiff Bridget was a passenger. Bridget, who was en route from Minneapolis to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Boutang v. Twin City Motor Bus Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- Chase v. Tingdale Bros.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Waldo v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- McKellar v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- Hill v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Faught Ex Rel. Faught v. WashamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
- Christy v. SalitermanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- Crum v. WardWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1961
- Ratner v. ArringtonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
- Affett v. Milwaukee & Suburban Transport Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.