Legal Opinion
In Re Moll
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 10, 1984No. C9-83-1565PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANSING, Judge.
The petitioner is a prisoner at the Minnesota Correctional Facility at Oak Park Heights. After voluntarily admitting himself to the Mental Health Unit (MHU), petitioner was committed to the MHU for up to six months, pursuant to the Minnesota Commitment Act of 1982, Minn.Stat. § 253B et seq. Petitioner now appeals, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the finding that he was mentally ill and challenging the trial court’s finding that there were no reasonable alternatives to commitment.
We affirm, but vacate the trial court’s order authorizing the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Youngberg v. Romeo Ex Rel. RomeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Shelton v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Mills v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Rennie v. KleinSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Rennie v. KleinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Matter of PopeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Matter of DanielsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- In Re BrownCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Matter of MinerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- Jarvis v. LevineCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.