Legal Opinion

Nature Conservancy v. Kolb

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 10, 1993No. 92-752PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Steele Hays, Justice.

This litigation involves disputed claims to a tract 100 feet wide across the north half of a section of land in Lonoke County. The tract, formerly used as a railroad right of way, extends across acreage owned by appellees, Edward and Betty Sue Schafer, and by appellees, Grace Evelyn Clayton Kolb, Jessie Pearl Gosney, John W. Clayton, Jr., and Edith Eleanor Taylor. The opposing claimants are appellants, The Nature Conservancy and Arkansas Natural Heritage Commission. The Schafer tract comprises the Wl/2 NW 1 /4 and the Kolb tract, the E 1/2 NW 1/4 and the NE 1/4.

In 1853…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Coastal States Gas Producing Company v. PateTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Jennings v. Amerada Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  3. Bodcaw Lumber Co. v. GoodeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
  4. City of Little Rock v. SawyerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
  5. Hampton v. Arkansas State Game & Fish CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Brown v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Petrus v. Nature ConservancySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  3. Deltic Timber Corp. v. NewlandCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010
  4. Brown v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Carpenter v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API