Legal Opinion
Exendine v. City of Sammamish
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided June 6, 2005No. 54570-1-IPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
113 P.3d 494 (2005)
Michael EXENDINE and Patricia Exendine, husband and wife, Appellants,
v.
CITY OF SAMMAMISH, a municipal corporation, Respondent.
No. 54570-1-I.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.
April 18, 2005.
As Amended on Denial of Reconsideration May 31, 2005.
Publication Ordered June 6, 2005.
Bill H. Williamson, Ross Williamson Loitz PLLC, Sea., WA, for Appellants.
Bruce Disend, Kenyon Dornay Marshall PLLC, Issaquah, WA, for Respondents.
SCHINDLER, J.
¶ 1 Michael and Patricia Exendine (the Exendines) challenge the jurisdiction of King County District Court (District Court) to issue…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Carroll v. JunkerWashington Supreme Court · 1971
- Seattle School District No. 1 v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- City of Seattle v. McCreadyWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Crosby v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- Allen v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- City of Spokane v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- City of Spokane v. County of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- Donald And Kathleen Miller v. City Of SammamishCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- Exendine v. Sammamish CityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- John Ketch LLC v. San Juan CountyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2024
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.