Legal Opinion

Exendine v. Sammamish City

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 22, 2008No. 06-35974Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM *

Michael Alden and Patricia Exendine brought suit against the City of Sammamish and three of its officers (“the City”) after the City barred the Exendines and them infant daughter from entering their residence for approximately one week in March of 2002. The Exendines allege violations of their rights under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments and several violations of state law. Specifically, they allege that the order to vacate (1) constituted an illegal seizure of the Exendines and their residence; (2) deprived the Ex-endines of their property without due process of law; (3)…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Reno v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Soldal v. Cook CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Grimsby v. SamsonWashington Supreme Court · 1975

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API