Legal Opinion
Allen v. City of Portland
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 17, 1996No. 93-35212PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FERGUSON, Circuit Judge:
The plaintiff appeals pro se the district court’s judgment for the defendants and the denial of her motion for a new trial. The plaintiff brought suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that the defendants violated her civil rights when they arrested her without probable cause, subjected her to excessive force, and deprived her of liberty without due process of law. The plaintiff also asserted state common law claims for false arrest, battery, and negligence. We hold as a matter of law *234that the plaintiff was arrested without probable cause in violation of her…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Baker v. McCollanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Henry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Chauncey L. Moore, Jr. v. The Marketplace Restaurant, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Laurie Tsao v. Desert Palace, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Tuan Van Tran v. Gary Lindsey, Warden Salinas Valley State Prisons State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Hart v. ParksCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Easyriders Freedom F.I.G.H.T. v. HanniganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Hsien I. Peng v. Mei Chin Penghu Jonathan Hu S. Gage, Los Angeles County Deputy, Badge No. 406857, Sued IndividuallyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.