Frame v. Portland Gold Min. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Colorado. This was an action by Mary Erame, the plaintiff in error, against the Portland Cold Mining Company, the defendant in error, for negligence. Judgment was rendered for the defendant upon a demurrer to the complaint, and a writ of error sued out to reverse this judgment.
1Opinion of the CourtSanborn, Circuit Judge
A motion has been made to dismiss the writ of error in this case because the assignment of errors was not filed until after the writ was issued. Section 997 of the Revised Statutes makes an assignment of errors, a prayer for reversal, and a citation to the adverse party essential parts of the record upon which a review of the rulings of a trial court may be invoked in the appellate courts of the United States. Rule 11 of this court (32 C. G. A. cxlvi.) provides that “the plaintiff in error or appellant shall file with ilie clerk of the court below, with his petition for the writ of error or…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- City of Lincoln v. Sun Vapor Street-Light Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1894
- Van Gunden v. Virginia Coal & Iron Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1892
- Grape Creek Coal Co. v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1894
- United States v. GoodrichCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1893
- Union Pac. Ry. Co. v. Colorado Eastern Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1893
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Simpson v. First Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
- United States v. McDonaldDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1923
- P. P. Mast & Co. v. Superior Drill Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1907
- Tyee Consolidated Mining Co. v. LangstedtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1903
- Lockman v. LangCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.