Legal Opinion

Union Pac. Ry. Co. v. Colorado Eastern Ry. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided February 6, 1893No. 145PublishedCited by 15 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Colorado. Proceeding by the Colorado Eastern Railway Company against the Union. Pacific Railway Company for the condemnation of certain land. Judgment for plaintiff. 41 Fed. Rep. 293. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

SANBORN, Circuit Judge.

The judgment in this case was rendered on November 23, 1891. The writ of error was sued out on June 14, 1892. This court has no jurisdiction of this case, since more than six months intervened between the entry of the judgment and the day on which the writ of error was sued out. U. S. v. Baxter, 51 Fed. Rep. 624, 2 C. C. A. 410; Brooks v. Norris, 11 How. 207; *23Scarborough v. Pargoud, 108 U. S. 567, 2 Sup. Ct. Rep. 877; Cummings v. Jones, 104 U. S. 419; Mussina v. Cavazos, 6 Wall. 355, 360. Moreover, the assignment oí errors was not hied until June 11,1892, which was more…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mussina v. CavazosSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. Scarborough v. PargoudSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. United States v. BaxterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1892
  4. Cummings v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1882

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Simpson v. First Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
  2. Frame v. Portland Gold Min. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
  3. Threadgill v. PlattU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Virginia · 1895
  4. Lockman v. LangCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
  5. Webber v. MihillsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API