Legal Opinion

Topanga Ass'n v. County of Los Angeles

California Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1974No. L.A. No. 30139PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TOBRINER, J.

We examine, in this case, aspects of the functions served by administrative agencies in the granting of zoning variances and of courts in reviewing these proceedings by means of administrative mandamus. We *510conclude that variance boards like the ones involved in the present case must render findings to support their ultimate rulings. We also conclude that when called upon to scrutinize a grant of a variance, a reviewing court must determine whether substantial evidence supports the findings of the administrative board and whether the findings support the board’s action.1 We…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Bixby v. PiernoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Strumsky v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Assn.California Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Friends of Mammoth v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  5. United States v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific R.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Topanga Assn. for a Scenic Comm. v. CTY OF LOS ANGELESCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Matthew v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1986
  3. Kifle-Thompson v. State Board of Chiropractic ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. Academy of Our Lady of Peace v. City of San DiegoDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2011
  5. Getz v. City of West HollywoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API