Ransome-Crummey Co. v. Woodhams
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Clara County, and from an order denying a new trial. J. B. Welch, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This in an appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment in defendant’s favor and from an order denying a new trial.
The action was brought to obtain a judgment declaring that the plaintiff has a lien upon a certain lot of the defendant in the town of Santa Clara for street work done by plaintiff under the provisions of the so-called Improvement Act of 1911 (Stats. 1911, p. 730). The answer of the defendant presents as the principal proposition in the ease the question as to whether the matter of street improvement in the town of Santa Clara is governed by the provisions of the general…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Oakland Paving Co. v. HiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Byrne v. DrainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Thomason v. AshworthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- People v. StephensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- Hager v. MeltonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1909
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Stillwell v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Coleman v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Bady v. DetwilerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Rosemary Properties, Inc. v. McColganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- McCarthy v. Board of Fire CommissionersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.