Legal Opinion
Amoco Chemical Co. v. Tex Tin Corp.
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided October 24, 1995No. Civ. A. G-95-405PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO REMAND
KENT, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, Amoco Chemical Co. (“Amoco”) and Amoco Corp., commenced this action in the 56th Judicial District Court of Galveston County, Texas. The gravamen of Plaintiffs’ Complaint is the alleged breach of a private contract which obligated Defendant Tex Tin Corp. (“Tex Tin”) to reimburse Amoco for expenses incurred under an Administrative Order on Consent involving the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 1446 (West 1994 & Supp 1995), Defendants removed this ease to the United States District…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Thompson Ex Rel. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Robert S. Frank v. Bear Stearns & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- Lopez v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2000
- Buerger v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.District Court, E.D. Texas · 1997
- Guardian National Acceptance Corp. v. Swartzlander Motors, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1997
- Frank v. Bear Stearns & CoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997