Legal Opinion
Jackpot Harvesting, Inc. v. Applied Underwriters, Inc.
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided March 28, 2019No. H044953PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDanner, J.
*724Applied Underwriters, Inc. and two entities associated with it appeal the trial court's denial of Applied's motion to compel arbitration. Applied offered workers' compensation insurance to Jackpot Harvesting, Inc. and two related companies through a number of agreements and documents, one of which contained an arbitration agreement. After its insurance premiums rapidly increased, Jackpot believed that Applied and the two entities had mishandled *320claims made under the policy and had wrongfully failed to disclose how they calculated insurance premiums. Jackpot filed suit in Monterey County…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. CardegnaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Rent-A-Center, West, Inc. v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Preston v. FerrerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- 65282 Two Bunch Palms Building LLC v. Coastal Harvest II, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
- Adir International v. The Travelers Indemnity CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2020
- J.R. v. Electronic ArtsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
- Lara v. Cal. Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 2025
- Peter L. Kaufman, Panish etc. v. Prospect Funding CA2/4California Court of Appeal · 2020