Bendix Corp. v. City of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GATES, J.
Plaintiff Bendix Corporation appeals from that portion of the judgment entered herein that denied it recovery of an overpayment of taxes on its gross receipts for the tax years 1976 and 1977. Having prevailed on the question of its entitlement to refunds for all other tax years, it does not challenge the remaining portion of the judgment. It contends:
“[I.] The relation back doctrine bars reliance on the statute of limitations. [II.] Equitable principles bar reliance on the statute of limitations. [III.] The City’s filing of actions against Bendix tolled all statutes of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- William Inglis & Sons Baking Co. v. Itt Continental Baking Company, Inc., William Inglis & Sons Baking Co. v. Itt Continental Baking Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Addison v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- DiGenova v. State Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Elkins v. DerbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Emslie v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ocean Services Corp. v. Ventura Port DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Sea World, Inc. v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Lee v. BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL TRUST AND SAVINGS ASS'NCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- McCauley v. Howard Jarvis Taxpayers AssociatonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Mercury Casualty Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986