Legal Opinion
In Re Wilson
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided February 25, 2005No. 19-00021PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PAMELA S. HOLLIS, Bankruptcy Judge.
Creditor GMAC Mortgage Corporation objected to confirmation of the Wilsons’ Chapter 13 plan, arguing that it impermis-sibly modifies GMAC’s rights to administer and enforce the terms of its home mortgage loan in violation of § 1322(b)(2) of the Bankruptcy Code. The Wilsons used the Chapter 13 Model Plan, which is required of all Chapter 13 debtors in the Northern District of Illinois (“Model Plan”). GMAC’s objections are not concerned with provisions unique to the Wil-sons’ plan but are limited to certain stan dard provisions contained in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United Sav. Assn. of Tex. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Nobelman v. American Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Ronald E. Grubbs v. Houston First American Savings AssociationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
- 10 Collier bankr.cas.2d 1280, Bankr. L. Rep. P 69,929 in the Matter of Hugh R. Clark and Joanne Clark, Debtors-Appellants. Federal Land Bank of St. PaulCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Lois Ann Singer v. Pierce & Associates, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In Re WatsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2008
- Greenpoint Mortgage Funding, Inc. v. Herrera (In Re Herrera)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- In Re AndersonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · 2008
- In Re JacksonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2011
- In re LisseUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2017
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.