Legal Opinion

Greenpoint Mortgage Funding, Inc. v. Herrera (In Re Herrera)

United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 5, 2010No. BAP Nos. CC-09-1155-PaHD, CC-09-1162-PaHD, CC-09-1184-PaHD, CC-09-1175 PaHD. Bankruptcy Nos. SV 08-13212-KT, SV 08-14725-GM, SV 09-11330-MT, LA 09-11321-VKPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PAPPAS, Bankruptcy Judge.

In each of these four appeals, the creditor holding the mortgage on the debtors’ primary residence challenges the order of the bankruptcy court confirming the chapter 13 1 debt-repayment plan. In each case, the debtors incorporated in the plan several provisions taken from a form of optional provisions adopted by the bankruptcy judges of the Central District of California. The mortgage creditors presented common objections to those provisions, and continue those objections in these four appeals. Because the facts in each case are undisputed, and common legal…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Butner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Dewsnup v. TimmSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. K Mart Corp. v. Cartier, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Nobelman v. American Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Barnhill v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Jaime Medrano v. Flagstar Bank, FsbCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  2. Marciano v. Fahs (In Re Marciano)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  3. Zotow v. Johnson (In Re Zotow)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  4. O & S Trucking, Inc. v. Mercedes Benz Financial Services USACourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
  5. In Re MonroyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API