Legal Opinion

Dickens v. Snodgrass, Dunlap & Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 15, 1994No. 69,942PublishedCited by 87 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

McFarland, J.;

In this action, Carol J. Dickens seeks damages on a wide variety of legal theories for the termination of her employment. The trial court entered summary judgment in favor of all defendants, and Ms. Dickens appeals therefrom.

In January 1987, Carol Dickens was hired by the accounting firm of Snodgrass, Dunlap & Company to work as a junior accountant. The firm has offices in Fredonia, Iola, Garnett, and Yates Center. Ms. Dickens worked at all times herein at the Fredonia office. Partner Joseph M. Bambick managed the Fredonia office. The…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. McLaughlin v. Richland Shoe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Conaway v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  5. Arthur Coleman v. Jiffy June Farms, Inc., James D. Hodgson, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Jiffy June Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by87 opinions

  1. Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co. of Pittsburg, Inc. v. Pepsico, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  2. Garcia-Paz v. Swift Textiles, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1995
  3. Burcham v. Unison Bancorp, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  4. L&M Enterprises, Inc. v. Bei Sensors & Systems Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  5. Hawkinson v. BennettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998

82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API