Russo v. Foster
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtRonan, J.
In this account annexed the plaintiff seeks to recover for board and room and for services rendered to the defendant’s testatrix and for disbursements made for her care and benefit. The answer is a general denial and payment. The judge found for the plaintiff and the defendant appealed from the order of the Appellate Division dismissing the report.
The decedent was the mother-in-law of the plaintiff. She came to live at the plaintiff’s home in June, 1933, and continued to live there, except upon occasional visits to friends, until December 4, 1936, when she went to a hospital where she died…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Narragansett Amusement Co. v. Riverside Park Amusement Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
- Dixon v. LamsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
- Spencer v. SpencerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
- DeBlois v. Boylston & Tremont Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Cromwell v. NortonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Watkins v. Simplex Time Recorder Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- Blanchard v. PorterMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1943