Legal Opinion

Cromwell v. Norton

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 18, 1906PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorton, J.

This is an action to recover the value of certain real estate conveyed by the plaintiff to the defendant. The case was tried partly on agreed facts arid partly on oral testimony. There was a verdict for the plaintiff, and the case is here on exceptions by the defendant to certain rulings and refusals to rule in regard to certain matters of evidence, and in regard to the statute of frauds and the statute of limitations, both of which defences were set up in the answer.

- - The plaintiff’s case was in substance this: In 1880, being about to go to sea, he conveyed the land in question to the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ryder v. LoomisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
  2. Kelley v. ThompsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
  3. Twomey v. CrowleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
  4. Miller v. RobertsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
  5. Peabody v. FellowsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Barber v. FoxMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1994
  2. Downey v. Union Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  3. Logan v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  4. Dixon v. LamsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  5. Donovan v. WalshMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API