Legal Opinion
Aronoff v. Franchise Tax Board
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 25, 1965No. 19617_1PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
348 F.2d 9
Stuart ARONOFF et al., Appellants,
v.
FRANCHISE TAX BOARD OF the STATE OF CALIFORNIA, State Board of Equalization, John W. Lynch, George E. Reilly, Paul R. Leake, Richard Nevins and Alan Cranston as members of the State Board of Equalization, Appellees.
No. 19617.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
June 25, 1965.
Thomas W. LeSage, Michael T. LeSage, Pasadena, Cal., for appellants.
Thomas Lynch, Atty. Gen. of Cal., Dan Kauffmann, Asst. Atty. Gen. of Cal., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.
Before BARNES and HAMLEY, Circuit Judges, and JAMESON, District Judge.
BARNES, Circuit Judge:
1
Th…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Matthews v. RodgersSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Aronoff v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Schaffer v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Aronoff v. Franchise Tax BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
3Cited by9 opinions
- Mandel v. HutchinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Kimmey v. H. A. Berkheimer, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
- Mandel v. HutchinsonDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1971
- Wood v. SargeantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Harold Randall, for Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Franchise Tax Board of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.