Legal Opinion

Mandel v. Hutchinson

District Court, C.D. California

Decided December 21, 1971No. Civ. 71-2327PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR THREE-JUDGE COURT AND DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE

HAUK, District Judge.

This matter arises upon the Complaint of Plaintiff on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated against the Assessors and Tax Collectors of each of the fifty-eight counties of the State of California. Plaintiff alleges that the residency requirements of Article XIII, Section iy4 of the California Constitution violate the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, that it interferes with interstate commerce,…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. SAMUELS Et Al. v. MACKELL, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF QUEENS COUNTY, Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Perez v. LedesmaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co. v. HuffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Matthews v. RodgersSupreme Court of the United States · 1932

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Percy Bland v. Robert McHannCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  2. Mandel v. HutchinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
  3. Kimmey v. H. A. Berkheimer, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Mobil Oil Corp. v. TullyDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1980
  5. Kistner v. MillikenDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1977

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API