Legal Opinion

Aronoff v. Franchise Tax Board

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 25, 1965No. 19617PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARNES, Circuit Judge:

This appeal arises from the district court dismissal of taxpayers’ complaint which sought to restrain appellees from enforcing assessments in California personal income taxes for the years 1951, 1952, 1953 and 1954. The district court determined that it was compelled to dismiss the complaint pursuant to the mandate of 28 U.S.C. § 1341 (sometimes called the Johnston Act). This section states:

“The district courts shall not enjoin, suspend or restrain the assessment, levy or collection of any tax under State law where a plain, speedy and efficient remedy may be had in the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Matthews v. RodgersSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Aronoff v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Schaffer v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cedarbrook Realty, Inc. v. NahillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Mandel v. HutchinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
  3. Aronoff v. Franchise Tax BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
  4. Cedarbrook Realty, Inc. v. NahillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Pahalad v. KijakaziDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API