Legal Opinion

Maurice Wendy v. McLean Trucking Company

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 30, 1960No. 26980PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant attacks the verdict and judgment for plaintiff in this personal injury and property damage action as against the “weight” of the credible evidence and “unsupported” by competent evidence. But this contention is obviously without merit. The evidence was ample to show that the driver of defendant’s truck and trailer, proceeding on a rainy afternoon on the lower ramp of the Manhattan Bridge toward Manhattan, hurried to pass a car in front of him and either skidded or drove across the center lane to hit the plaintiff’s car going toward Brooklyn in the far lane on the latter’s right.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Julius Nagler v. Admiral CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
  2. Couto v. United Fruit Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Goodman v. PolandDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1975
  2. Opper v. Hancock Securities CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
  3. DeCicco v. Trinidad Area Health Ass'nColorado Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Poloron Products, Inc. v. Lybrand Ross Bros. & MontgomeryDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976
  5. Riggs, Ferris & Geer v. Harrison LillibridgeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API