Legal Opinion

Couto v. United Fruit Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 27, 1953No. 182, Docket 22566PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANK, Circuit Judge.

This was a suit by plaintiff, a seaman, under the Jones Act, 46 U.S.C.A. § 688, for injuries sustained while serving on defendant’s ship. At the trial by judge and jury, there was evidence as follows: Plaintiff was directed by the boatswain to “slush” the stays, i. e., to apply a preservative compound to steel cables permanently installed between the ship’s side at deck level and a point on the masts about forty-five feet above the deck. To do this work, plaintiff used a “bosun’s chair,” i. <?., a board used as a seat, with short lengths of rope fastened to each corner.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Keen v. Overseas Tankship Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
  2. Fanchon & Marco, Inc. v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Julius Nagler v. Admiral CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
  2. Opper v. Hancock Securities CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
  3. Riggs, Ferris & Geer v. Harrison LillibridgeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
  4. Fuller v. Preferred Risk Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  5. Guanzon v. KalamauHawaii Supreme Court · 1965

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API