Legal Opinion
Poloron Products, Inc. v. Lybrand Ross Bros. & Montgomery
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 21, 1976No. 72 Civ. 3884 (WCC)PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CONNER, District Judge:
The above-captioned action, a subject of unhappily protracted litigation, is once again before this Court, on cross-motions pressed by plaintiff Dynamark Corporation (Dynamark) and defendant Coopers & Lybrand (Lybrand). The latter has renewed its earlier motion to dismiss the amended complaint herein, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) F.R. Civ.P., for failure to state a claim upon which relief might be granted. Dynamark, for its part, presently moves under Rule 15(a), F.R.Civ.P., for leave to amend the complaint once again.
In an April 3, 1975 Memorandum and…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Cruz v. BetoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,853 John Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,959 Frank Lanza, Jr. v. Drexel & Co., Theodore J. Kircher and Christie F. VitoloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Caribbean Broadcasting System, Ltd. v. Cable & Wireless PLCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- In Re Investors Funding Corp., Etc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1980
- Town of New Windsor v. Tesa Tuck, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Driscoll v. George Washington UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Miscellaneous Service Workers, Drivers & Helpers, Teamsters Local 427 v. Philco-ford Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.