Legal Opinion

Integrated Health Services of Michigan, at Riverbend, Inc., Petitioner/cross-Respondent, Teamsters Local 332 (97-6034), Intervenor v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross-Petitioner

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided September 17, 1999No. 97-6034Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

191 F.3d 703 (6th Cir. 1999)

Integrated Health Services of Michigan, at Riverbend, Inc., Petitioner/Cross-Respondent,

Teamsters Local 332 (97-6034), Intervenor,

v.

National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/Cross-Petitioner.

Nos. 97-6034, 97-6109

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

Argued: November 6, 1998

Decided and Filed: September 17, 1999

On Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board; No. 7-CA-39662[Copyrighted Material Omitted]

Brad A. Rayle, HOWARD & HOWARD, Bloomfield Hills, Michigan, for Petitioner.

Wayne A.…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Ryan; Concurring in the judgment.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Melda Turker v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Health Care & Retirement Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Schnuck Markets, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. Schnuck Markets, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
  4. Caremore, Inc., D/B/A Altercare of Hartville, Petitioner/cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross-PetitionerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  5. National Labor Relations Board v. Beacon Light Christian Nursing HomeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API