National Labor Relations Board v. Health Care & Retirement Corp. of America
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kennedy
The National Labor Relations Act (Act) affords employees the rights to organize and to engage in collective bargaining free from employer interference. The Act does not grant *573those rights to supervisory employees, however, so the statutory definition of supervisor becomes essential in determining which employees are covered by the Act. In this case, we decide the narrow question whether the National Labor Relations Board’s (Board’s) test for determining if a nurse is a supervisor is consistent with the statutory definition.
I
Congress enacted the National Labor Relations Act in 1935. Act of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- National Labor Relations Board v. Bell Aerospace Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Packard Motor Car Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Fall River Dyeing & Finishing Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Public Employees Retirement System of Ohio v. BettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by160 opinions
- Vance v. Ball State Univ.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
- National Labor Relations Board v. Kentucky River Community Care, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Juan Mario Arrieta, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- In Re Application for Pen Register & Trap/Trace Device With Cell Site Location AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2005
- Caremore, Inc., D/B/A Altercare of Hartville, Petitioner/cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross-PetitionerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
155 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.