Legal Opinion

Biever v. Szultek

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1948PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWickhem, J.

The questions here relate solely to damages, defendants contending that the awards were excessive, that tile medical evidence as to the cause of Edward Biever’s loss of hearing leaves the matter in a state of speculation, and that there was no evidence whatever that the accident to Esther Biever caused her alleged injuries.

Edward Biever testified that following the accident, during the course of which he sustained an injury to his head, he had pains in his head, shoulders, and neck, and that a few days after the accident he noticed that the heating in his right ear was. adversely affected and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Vogelsburg v. Mason & Hanger Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1947

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lieberthal v. Glens Falls Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
  2. Nash-Kelvinator Corp. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Johnson v. ArmitageWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Derenne v. VliesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Sharkey v. MichelsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API