Legal Opinion
T.E.A.M. Scaffolding Systems, Inc. v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided January 24, 2002No. 01-2341, 01-2451UnpublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Per curiam
To obtain subcontracting work on a Union job, T.E.A.M. Scaffolding Systems, Inc. (TEAM) was required to sign the National Maintenance Agreement (NMA) with the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America (Union) and receive union permission for that particular job. TEAM requested “all necessary paperwork” to become signatory to the NMA, and arranged to sign the papers at the Union’s local office. Although it was not discussed with TEAM, the Union also required all NMA signatories to sign the Number One Agreement, a one-page, two-sided, comprehensive agreement requiring signatories…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Southwest Administrators, Inc. v. Rozay's Transfer, a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Robert Del Raso v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- State Ex Rel. PaineWebber, Inc. v. VoorheesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
- Computer Network, Ltd. v. Purcell Tire & Rubber Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Trustees of the Twin City Bricklayers v. McArthur Tile Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2005
- Raines v. Steve Junge Installations, LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2021
- Silgan Containers Corp. v. Sheet Metal Workers International Ass'n, Local Union No. 2Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016