West Virginia Department of Transportation, Division of Highways v. Western Pocahontas Properties, L.P.
West Virginia Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Justice KETCHUM:
It is a well-established rule in the law of eminent domain that a jury may not award just compensation for the lost profits of a business on land taken by condemnation.1 However, in this appeal of a jury’s $24 million verdict in a condemnation case, a litigant testified and valued his interest in a tract of condemned land using.only the future lost profits of his business. Despite this evidence, the' Cireuit Court of Tucker County refused to instruct the jury to disregard lost *58business profits when calculating just compensation.
As set forth below, we reverse the circuit…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- State v. GuthrieWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
- Tennant v. Marion Health Care Foundation, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
- United States v. Virginia Electric & Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Sanders v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1976
- United States v. 564.54 Acres of Monroe and Pike County LandSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Jeffery Moore v. Equitrans, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022
- Loretta Lynn Gomez v. Kanawha County CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2016
- Board of County Commissioners of County of Weld v. DPG Farms, LLCColorado Court of Appeals · 2017
- SER W. Va. Dept. of Transportation, Div. of Highways v. Hon. Robert A. Burnside, Jr., JudgeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2016
- BRG Associates v. Larry Hess, Assessor of Berkley CountyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2017
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.