Legal Opinion
Renard T. Polk v. John Henley
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided July 9, 2026No. 3:26-cv-00311Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 4 5 RENARD T. POLK, Case No. 3:26-cv-00311-ART-CSD 6 Petitioner, v. ORDER DENYING 7 POST-JUDGMENT MOTION JOHN HENLEY, 8 Respondent. 9 10 11 Pro se Petitioner Renard T. Polk filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 12 under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. (ECF No. 1-1 (“Petition”).) The Court dismissed the 13 Petition based on Polk’s failure to state claims for which relief may be granted 14 and denied a Certificate of Appealability. (ECF No. 7.) Judgment was entered. 15 (ECF No. 8.) Polk filed an appeal and a motion to alter or amend the judgment. 16…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Joseph Wood, III v. Charles RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Kirk Rishor v. Bob FergusonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- United National Insurance Company, a Pennsylvania Corporation, and Travelers Casualty and Surety Company, Formerly Known as Aetna Casualty and Surety Company v. R&d Latex Corporation, a Georgia Corporation Royalty Carpet Mills, Inc., a California Corporation, and Mydrin, Inc., for Itself and as Successor in Interest to R&d Latex Corp., Mydrin, Inc., for Itself and as Successor in Interest to R&d Latex Corp., Plaintiff-Counter v. Travelers Casualty and Surety Company, Formerly Known as Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellant, and William C. Morison-Knox and Michael D. ProughCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. LopezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.