Legal Opinion
Anzures v. Flagship Restaurant Group
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 22, 2016No. 15-1332PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KELLY, Circuit Judge.
Joe Anzures appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his case for lack of personal jurisdiction over defendants. We have appellate jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
BACKGROUND
Anzures is a Colorado resident, and defendants Nick Hogan and Flagship Restaurant Group are Nebraska residents. Anzures and non-party Jared Mitilier (a California resident) contacted defendant Hogan in Omaha, Nebraska, about starting a business venture (all three had been high-school classmates in Nebraska). The proposed business was to broker the sale of pre-paid financial…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Walden v. FioreSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Dental Dynamics v. Jolly Dental GroupCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
- Eighteen Seventy v. JaysonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2022
- Satterfield v. Gov't Emps. Ins. Co.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2018
- Celtig, LLC v. PateyDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2018
- Aclin v. PD-RX Pharmaceuticals Inc.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2016
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.