Legal Opinion

Celtig, LLC v. Patey

District Court, D. Utah

Decided September 26, 2018No. Case No. 2:17-cv-01086-JNPPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

b. Arising From

The second step in the minimum contacts analysis is to determine whether the claims brought by Third-Party Plaintiffs "arise out of" Edwards's "suit-related" contacts with the forum. Anzures v. Flagship Rest. Grp. , 819 F.3d 1277, 1280 (10th Cir. 2016). The claims brought against Edwards in the third-party complaint do arise from his alleged contacts with Utah, which relate exclusively to the present dispute. As discussed above, however, the contacts as alleged are insufficient to establish minimum contacts with the forum.

c. Insufficient Contacts

Due process requires that a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Pro Axess, Inc. v. Orlux Distribution, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  3. Anzures v. Flagship Restaurant GroupCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. BMF Advance v. LitiscapeDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2022
  2. Capana Swiss Advisors AG, a Swiss corporation, et al. v. Rymark, a Utah corporation, et al.; Ashley Miron Leshem et al.District Court, D. Utah · 2026
  3. Frazier v. Eagle Air Med CorporationDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2024
  4. Leland William Calder v. Andy Zweber, et al.District Court, D. Utah · 2026
  5. Williams v. RobisonDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API