Legal Opinion

BCL Enterprises, Inc. v. Ohio Department of Liquor Control

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1997No. 95-2189PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.

The sole question we must answer in this appeal is whether the Court of Common Pleas of Franklin County is vested with subject-matter jurisdiction over the claims asserted by BCL.

“Subject-matter jurisdiction of a court connotes the power to hear and decide a case upon its merits * * Morrison v. Steiner (1972), 32 Ohio St.2d 86, 61 O.O.2d 335, 290 N.E.2d 841, paragraph one of the syllabus. Section 4(B), Article IV of the Ohio Constitution, states that “[t]he courts of common pleas and divisions thereof shall have such original jurisdiction over all justiciable matters * * * as may be provided…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Morrison v. SteinerOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Franklin County Law Enforcement Ass'n v. Fraternal Order of Police, Capital City Lodge No. 9Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
  3. American Life & Accident Ins. v. JonesOhio Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Kazmaier Supermarket, Inc. v. Toledo Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Racing Guild of Ohio, Local 304 v. Ohio State Racing CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Lingo v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Quigley v. Garden Valley Fire Protection Dist.California Supreme Court · 2019
  3. State ex rel. Vanni v. McMonagleOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  4. State ex rel. CannAscend Ohio, L.L.C. v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  5. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. Vaughn Industries, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API