Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Blohme v. Blohme

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1958No. 34270PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1ConcurrenceWenke, J.

Although I am of the opinion that in certain respects, as herein set forth, our opinion comes to an incorrect holding, I am, however, for the reasons hereinafter set forth, of the opinion that the conclusion arrived at therein is correct and for that reason concur with the court in overruling appellant’s motion for rehearing.

In this motion for rehearing appellant contends we erred in holding the testimony of Elise Blohme, as to conversations she had with her deceased husband, was inadmissible. In the opinion we held: “There was testimony of Elise Blohme, to which sufficient objec tion was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Tanzola v. De RitaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Lyon v. ProutyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  3. Stocker v. StockerNebraska Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Short v. KleppingerNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Preston v. PrestonMichigan Supreme Court · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Schaneman v. WrightNebraska Supreme Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API