Legal Opinion
Rippey v. Denver United States National Bank
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided July 3, 1967No. Civ. A. No. 66-C-359PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
WILLIAM E. DOYLE, Judge.
Defendants have again moved, under Rule 19, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, to dismiss this diversity action for failure to join “indispensable” parties. We have previously denied an identical motion, Rippey v. Denver United States National Bank, D.Colo.1966, 260 F.Supp. 704, but the defendants now assert that discovery has revealed certain facts, and that certain developments have transpired in a related state court action, which compel dismissal at this juncture.
The new circumstances relied upon by the defendants are: 1) that the life…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Mollan v. TorranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Elmendorf v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1825
- Spector Motor Service, Inc. v. O'ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Souffront v. La Compagnie Des Sucreries De Porto RicoSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Cooper v. Texas Gulf Industries, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1974
- Koehler v. DodwellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
- Landes v. Capital City BankUtah Supreme Court · 1990
- Koehler v. DodwellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
- Rippey v. Denver United States National BankDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1967
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.