Legal Opinion

Smith v. Safety Coach Line, Inc.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 14, 1926PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrogden, J.

The controlling question presented by the record is whether or not there was sufficient evidence to take the case to the jury. The defendant contends that there is not such evidence by reason of the fact that the plaintiff testified that the name of the bus that struck him was “The Sheik,” which was not owned by the defendant, and that thereafter during the trial the plaintiff testified that the name of the bus which caused the injury, was “Miss Burlington,” said bus being owned by the defendant. Irrespective of the name of the bus, the witness Oates testified, without objection, that after…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Shell v. . RosemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  2. Ward v. Odell Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  3. Evans Ex Rel. Pendleton v. Dare Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  4. In Re Will of FullerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  5. Shaw v. National Handle Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Cole v. KoonceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  2. Cole v. . KoonceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  3. Hancock v. . WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  4. Manheim Ex Rel. Manheim v. Blue Bird Taxi Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  5. Crone v. . FisherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API