Legal Opinion

Shaw v. National Handle Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 24, 1924PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.

The first group of exceptions and assignments of error by defendants are to the court below permitting Dr. Garriss, plaintiff’s witness, to answer the following questions:

“Q. What effect, so far as increasing or decreasing the saturation of the air, would the turning of the discharge from the combustion into the apartment itself have? A. When carbon monoxide is eliminated; regardless of by gasoline engine or gas plant, if eliminated into a closed room, if the saturation is as much as three per cent, it will kill inside of ten or fifteen minutes.
“Q. From your examination of the boat, the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Baltimore & Potomac Railroad v. MacKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Ridge v. Norfolk Southern RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  3. State v. FelterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
  4. Deligny v. Tate Furniture Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  5. Myers v. Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1901

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Smith v. Safety Coach Line, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  2. Town of Ayden v. LancasterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  3. Howard v. . Texas Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  4. Jackson Ex Rel. Porter v. ScheiberSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  5. Southwell v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API