Legal Opinion

State v. Phillips

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 20, 2018No. 49/17PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilner, J.

We granted certiorari in this case to review, again, the manner in which Article IV, § 22 of the Maryland Constitution, providing for an in banc appeal from a "decision or determination of any point or question" by a Circuit Court judge, is intended to operate. In the end, our decision will be based on the wording of § 22 and Md. Rule 2-551. To be faithful to the standards for interpreting Constitutional provisions, however, we will need to review in some detail the origin and development of § 22 and some of our prior case law even though, regrettably, that lengthens the Opinion.

BACKGROUND

On…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Reed v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  2. Sigma Reproductive Health Center v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  3. Gluckstern v. SuttonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  4. Board of Medical Examiners v. StewardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  5. Phillips v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  2. Bennett v. Harford CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2023
  3. Kopp v. SchraderCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
  4. Phillips v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  5. 107oag033, Maryland Attorney General Reports2022

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API