Saletic v. Stamnes
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.
Appellants, who were plaintiffs below, appeal from a final judgment, after trial, dismissing their complaint for an accounting of a joint venture. The evidence is not brought here, so the question is: Do the findings support the judgment?
This depends upon whether or not the bilateral contract, 2 which is set out in the findings as follows, was entire or severable:
“. . . It is hereby mutually agreed by all parties hereto concerned that the Purse Seine Boats Emblem, Holy Cross, Sea Foam and Invincible are to pool all fish caught by them during the entire fishing season in the Alaskan Peninsula…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Denver v. RoaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Cook v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1950
- Henry v. BassettSupreme Court of Missouri · 1881
- Higgins v. EgbertWashington Supreme Court · 1947
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Coto Settlement v. EisenbergCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Zuver v. Airtouch Communications, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
- Zuver v. Airtouch Communications, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
- Adler v. Fred Lind ManorWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- Multicare Medical Center v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 1990
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.